Unbiased Connect Content Review
I have been thinking about ConnectContent for awhile and actually joined for a couple months to test it out. I actually decided to give it a whirl because several of my peers were really pushing it and I figured that at $12 bucks a month, what did I really have to lose, right? Well, after a couple months, I can actually speak my peace about this subscription based program. To be fair to RT Cunningham, you can find other reviews of people I listen to and trust here, here and here.
I should mention that I am not an affiliate of this program and therefore have absolutely no reason to persuade you into trying it. This is solely based on my personal experience with ConnectContent.
So what is ConnectContent and what can it do for you?
Simply put, ConnectContent is nothing more than a link acquisition service with a twist. Most of these link building services like linkvana operate under high priced membership sites. The premise is simple. You write a little 100 word blurb and anchor a little text as your keyword and they put it on one of their many sites within their network. The problem of course, is the price….most of the better link subscription services are anywhere within the ball park of $100-200 per month.
ConnectContent is similar but different. Instead of relying on a network of sites that is owned by the principle, ConnectContent is nothing more than a connector of webmasters that are looking for links from other webmasters in their prospective niche.
Of course, I shouldn’t have to tell you what the benefit of using these types of services could be in regards to ranking your keywords in the search engines. Obviously, if you are to believe that links matter, then finding other sites easily without having to do the grunt work (more on this in a few) that most SEO types have to do for their clients.
So, you log in, you list your site, along with tags that will make it easier for other webmasters to find you and list the anchor text that you want them to use. They in turn will find a spot on one of their pages on their site and place the anchor thus giving you a link. You will do the same thing for others. And so, you get webmasters helping webmasters by forming a “link co-op” of sorts.
And in order for it to really work, there are rules in place to ensure that someone can’t simply grab links and not give. The higher the PR of the linking page, the more points you get and therefore the more potential you get for getting links. On the other side, if you are linking to a bunch of PR n/a pages, you will need a bunch of them to be able to qualify for a PR1 link, ect. This rule is supposed to encourage members to link to their most best pages and thus pass on the best PR to the person wanting the link.
But does it work?
In a perfect world, I would have listed a webmaster’s page on one of my best sites and another webmaster would do the same. That would be the most ideal situation. In a less than perfect world, you would get links that would be both very good mixed with not so good links.
HOWEVER, in the case of ConnectContent (at least in my experience), the links I recieved were from sites that were new to fairly new that were hosted on free blog networks like blogspot on sites that may be a step up from a link farm. To spell it out, the links were not only not great, but were from sites that I could have easily made myself and had a better chance of building trustrank over time.
In fact, I have to wonder if some of these sites were built for the purpose of housing the links so that they could recieve links themselves. In other words, they were in effect, gaming the system. I should mention that this isn’t JT’s fault. When you offer a co-op, you have to expect most to still be as self-serving as possible.
That’s it. Would I suggest this? Based on my experience, probably not. While it could be a decent way to diversify (and it is cheap), there are far better ways to get links than to rely on link building networks. It ain’t a solution though (and to be fair, neither is linkvana) in which a webmaster can simply use this one service and not expect to do anything else.
Better solutions to linkbuilding on the cheap
So, since I would’t recommend ConnectContent, I am sure you are wondering what other options are there for the struggling webmaster trying to get backlinks worth something, right?
These options take a little grunt work but will possibly pay off not only in link acquisition but also in building relationships with your peers. And regardless of what you think, you are either going to pay for your links or build relationships to get links.
- Blogrolls- Do a search query for your keyword and start sending emails to those in your niche asking for a blogroll exchange (for those using them). Yeah, I know that blogroll links aren’t exactly that sexy BUT they still work to a degree and WILL boost your rankings. Plus, you are becoming involved in the community that you are serving. Expect to get turned down or ignored along the way.
- Anchor text exchanges- Like blogrolls, you can also contact a fellow webmaster and offer them what I like to call a 1 for 1. How this works is you ask them to place some anchor text in one of their older articles (you will need to ping it) going to your site and promise them the same. This works. It is effective. But it does require you to reach out. That said, you will find that you will not only build links but will build relationships with others in your market.
- Boost the rankings of the links you already have- Let’s face it, we are all pretty narcissistic by nature. We only do things that directly will help us. We don’t want to spend the time and energy on other people’s sites. The reality is that if we were helping those that were helping us, we would be far more successful than ignoring the sites linking to us. If you happen to get listed on a mid level blog or website, why not build a quick lens or hubpage linking to their site? Why not? Why not build a wordpress blog with a few tags with their link on it? Wouldn’t it bolster your site by improving the page rank of the site in question? Why not bookmark it, list it on digg, take an excerpt and post it on scribd as a word document? Most won’t consider this as practical but it is what I do for most of my money sites.
Anyhow, Connect Content may be decent for a webmaster that is looking for other supplemental link building strategies but I wouldn’t expect the world. Then again, at $12 a month, you can’t expect the stars….Until next week
Hey you...yeah...YOU...you have stopped by a few times...why not drop me a comment and add to the conversation? I would love to know what you think...Check out my Comment Policy
9 Responses to “Unbiased Connect Content Review”
Comments
Read below or add a comment...

Hey Leo,
I found you by way of Justin at SEO Zombie. You really have some great information here and I really appreciate the work all you guys who are sharing SEO techniques do to let us new people in on the game a little. SEO is a facinating subject.
In regards to CC, I understand how someone with a lot of high ranking sites may not get a lot of benefit out of the sevice, maybe, but I only have low ranking sites so I don't have any other links to give. Since being a member I have received over 80 links. Most of them are pr0 but in my case that is much better than nothing which is what I would have had otherwise. I have also got a few ranked linked but not many. As I continue to build authority for my sites the links I give out will be better and better. I agree that you shouldn't use only one method of link building but for me, starting out, it has been great to get links that I wouldn't have known how to do.
That is just my opinion.
I look forward to reading more of your SEO theory, I am fascinated with how science and art are intertwined to make it work.
Hi Agrande,
Thanks for commenting. Don't get me wrong, I am not necessarily against Connect-Content. I think what JT has going is a good thing, especially for webmasters that are struggling. BUT, the point I was making was that most of the links that are exchanged aren't coming from self-hosted domains but are coming from the free kind. What this tells me is that the people who are using the service are either doling out links on sites that they don't necessarily care about or are really hesitant to link up to their blogs and websites that do matter to them (by the way, I am in no way saying that free hosted blogs can't get ranked or don't get ranked…I am just saying that it was my experience that I was getting links from sites with questionable integrity).
The big, uh-oh dilemma that new webmasters have isn't getting links. Anyone can get links. It is getting links that matter. For one reason or another, everyone has gravitated toward PR as the sole determiner of importance, link wise. I think it goes much, much further than that. I think that getting links from sites that are trusted by google is where the bang is at. And that, unfortunately, can't easily be measured.
Hi Leo,
I agree with your idea of trusted sites and I really liked your post about that. I think we may very well see, and maybe already have seen, Google start to discount links from Blogger, et al, and also articles marketing. Once everyone gets on the bandwagon Google is great for changing the game and I really expect this will happen.
So does this mean we should concentrate on building up just a few trusted sites instead of niches?
well, trusted sites have a ton more power BUT take time and most marketers don't or aren't willing to invest in a ton of time without seeing some benefit fairly quick. I mess with both. When I build a niche network, I typically will have anywhere between 100-400 articles and will inundate that niche using primarily parisitic hosting companies with established trust rank. It works for me but once again, your success rate will ultimately depend on how well your marketing plan is formed. That is my 2 cents anyways. That said, there are a million different ways to arrive at the same conclusion.
Thanks for the great insight,
How much more valuable do you think links from squidoo or hubpages are than from a blogger blog.
Also, do the links in squidoo, etc. need to be in post instead of blogroll type?
Sorry Agrande, I only get to respond to the few comments I get for this blog about once a day. As far as value, it changes. If you remember, a couple years ago Squidoo was THE place for niche marketers…then the slap from google came and many marketers watched as their rankings disappeared. These days, there are several parasitic hosts that rank well with google. The key is to watch it, log it and use it.
Links in posts or blogroll….well, typically I will use parisitic hosts for one of two reasons…
1. to form a link chain for the juice.
2. to sell something directly.
There are some things you need to consider. Covering your tracks is important….well, that is all I am going to say about that actually, lol.
Leo,
I just did a Google search for “connect content review” and you were no.1
I’ve written my own ConnectContent review which arrives at a similar-ish conclusion to yourself. I think it has the potential to be amazing but unfortunately there doesn’t appear to be too much activity at the moment.
I like the fact that you wrote an “unbiased” reivew. This was my intention and I don’t have an affiliate link on mine either. If you’d like a mention (aka a backlink) on my review, hit me up to discuss.
Cheers,
AJ
AJ’s last blog post..ConnectContent review | Connect Content review
Thanks AJ…I didn’t even know. To be real honest, I don’t closely follow my rankings for this blog as this is more a labor of love than real work. I know it sounds hard to believe but I am really not too concerned with where the dominos fall in relation to this blog.