<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Week Marketing Review Redux II and Hubpages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/</link>
	<description>Real Marketing Strategies for the Virtual World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:37:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>I actually have no sites up in relation to OWM because it focuses on web 2.0 properties like squidoo (which I don&#039;t use)....just pages.  That said, I probably have around  60 or so pages up but nothing any more complex that an occasional link from one to another.  You know the drill...research a keyword...write an article...rank it..get traffic....rinse and repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have no sites up in relation to OWM because it focuses on web 2.0 properties like squidoo (which I don&#8217;t use)&#8230;.just pages.  That said, I probably have around  60 or so pages up but nothing any more complex that an occasional link from one to another.  You know the drill&#8230;research a keyword&#8230;write an article&#8230;rank it..get traffic&#8230;.rinse and repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>Thanks Leo,

How many sites do you have up and how long did it take you to do it?  Are the sites complex with lots of articles and banners?

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Leo,</p>
<p>How many sites do you have up and how long did it take you to do it?  Are the sites complex with lots of articles and banners?</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>Yeah, OWM should earn you that fairly easily.  I am currently making roughly $400 a month with the sites I have in place in relation to OWM.  This could easily be scalable but really relies on the trustrank of the web2.0 properties to stay the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, OWM should earn you that fairly easily.  I am currently making roughly $400 a month with the sites I have in place in relation to OWM.  This could easily be scalable but really relies on the trustrank of the web2.0 properties to stay the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1468</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1468</guid>
		<description>Thanks for responding Leo.  I wouldn&#039;t need help on the keyword research part of things.  I pretty much know how to target a niche and slect my keywords.  It&#039;s more about the organization of it all.  I&#039;d like to add $200-$300 each month in income.  Do you think that&#039;s doable with this system?  My goal is to have  a handful of sites or less making me $3k+/month.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for responding Leo.  I wouldn&#8217;t need help on the keyword research part of things.  I pretty much know how to target a niche and slect my keywords.  It&#8217;s more about the organization of it all.  I&#8217;d like to add $200-$300 each month in income.  Do you think that&#8217;s doable with this system?  My goal is to have  a handful of sites or less making me $3k+/month.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

I believe that OWM is a good product yeah, but not for the reason that it is intended for.....with that I mean Squidoo.  However, you can use other web 2.0 properties in conjunction with her system and I have gotten pretty good results.  Since you aren&#039;t a newbie, I have to wonder if this will just be rehash for you though.  The system isn&#039;t new but the good part is that she gives an A-B-C kind of plan to help those who don&#039;t have the discipline to incorporate it which is invaluable to someone new to marketing.  The process is the same as most processes, man.  You do a little research, pick a niche and then match keywords to whatever you are offering.  Sounds familiar, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>I believe that OWM is a good product yeah, but not for the reason that it is intended for&#8230;..with that I mean Squidoo.  However, you can use other web 2.0 properties in conjunction with her system and I have gotten pretty good results.  Since you aren&#8217;t a newbie, I have to wonder if this will just be rehash for you though.  The system isn&#8217;t new but the good part is that she gives an A-B-C kind of plan to help those who don&#8217;t have the discipline to incorporate it which is invaluable to someone new to marketing.  The process is the same as most processes, man.  You do a little research, pick a niche and then match keywords to whatever you are offering.  Sounds familiar, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>Hi Leo,

Thanks for this honest review.  So..bottomline...would you recommend OWM for someone aiming to hit $2k+/month in the next 6-8 months?  Are there other products that you would recommend before OWM?  I&#039;m not a newbie and have some of my own products which are starting to do well on clickbank, but I just havent been able to get an organized gameplan going with affiliate marketing and niche sites.

Matt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Leo,</p>
<p>Thanks for this honest review.  So..bottomline&#8230;would you recommend OWM for someone aiming to hit $2k+/month in the next 6-8 months?  Are there other products that you would recommend before OWM?  I&#8217;m not a newbie and have some of my own products which are starting to do well on clickbank, but I just havent been able to get an organized gameplan going with affiliate marketing and niche sites.</p>
<p>Matt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>Hey Anamika,

Squidoo doesn&#039;t rank as well as hubpages, at least for now and for that reason, I see no benefit to using it.  Of course, this could change tomorrow or whenever Google decides.  The thing I was really trying to drive home is PotpieGirl&#039;s product could be used for any web2.0 property that is ranking.  The reason why we use web2.0 properties is because of the trust rank that google has warranted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Anamika,</p>
<p>Squidoo doesn&#8217;t rank as well as hubpages, at least for now and for that reason, I see no benefit to using it.  Of course, this could change tomorrow or whenever Google decides.  The thing I was really trying to drive home is PotpieGirl&#8217;s product could be used for any web2.0 property that is ranking.  The reason why we use web2.0 properties is because of the trust rank that google has warranted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anamika</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1460</link>
		<dc:creator>Anamika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1460</guid>
		<description>HubPages has worked well for me and i have already published 293 articles so far using my 2 ID&#039;s.  I joined Squidoo too but it looked too complicated to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HubPages has worked well for me and i have already published 293 articles so far using my 2 ID&#8217;s.  I joined Squidoo too but it looked too complicated to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ Lissie&lt;/b&gt;  I have to agree with you in regards to hubpages.  I think the reason PPG doesn&#039;t advocate it is that her peeps that are following her are traditional marketers and use the typical stuff traditional (in-your-face) marketers use.  Hubpages doesn&#039;t want that.  They want good content.  If you look at most squidoo lenses built by marketers, they are pretty thin, content wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@ Lissie</b>  I have to agree with you in regards to hubpages.  I think the reason PPG doesn&#8217;t advocate it is that her peeps that are following her are traditional marketers and use the typical stuff traditional (in-your-face) marketers use.  Hubpages doesn&#8217;t want that.  They want good content.  If you look at most squidoo lenses built by marketers, they are pretty thin, content wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lissie</title>
		<link>http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/one-week-marketing-review-redux-ii-and-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>lissie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/?p=1111#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been on hubpages for 2 years and have recently started some new &quot;personas&quot; to follow along with Court&#039;s 100 hubs challenge. PPG is wrong - hubpages is absolutely fine with marketers  - &lt;b&gt;so long as you produce unqiue good unique content. &lt;/b&gt; -I&#039;ve not heard of anyone getting banned at hubpages for particpating in the 100hubs /30 days challenge. You can also put direct affiilate links in your hubs (no more than 2) so long as the content is unique

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;lissie’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://lissowerbutts.com/site-build-it-scam-review-redux/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Site Build It Scam Review Redux!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been on hubpages for 2 years and have recently started some new &#8220;personas&#8221; to follow along with Court&#8217;s 100 hubs challenge. PPG is wrong &#8211; hubpages is absolutely fine with marketers  &#8211; <b>so long as you produce unqiue good unique content. </b> -I&#8217;ve not heard of anyone getting banned at hubpages for particpating in the 100hubs /30 days challenge. You can also put direct affiilate links in your hubs (no more than 2) so long as the content is unique</p>
<p><abbr><em>lissie’s last blog post..<a href="http://lissowerbutts.com/site-build-it-scam-review-redux/" rel="nofollow">Site Build It Scam Review Redux!</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
